From 125cf0a7f2acb909b15193d5806d605eaa3cb278 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Timothy Pearson Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2016 23:15:13 -0500 Subject: Make cryptographic card reader detection on single readers sytems more robust --- tdecore/tdehw/tdecryptographiccarddevice.cpp | 15 +++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) (limited to 'tdecore') diff --git a/tdecore/tdehw/tdecryptographiccarddevice.cpp b/tdecore/tdehw/tdecryptographiccarddevice.cpp index 4e3e6f77d..919a708e2 100644 --- a/tdecore/tdehw/tdecryptographiccarddevice.cpp +++ b/tdecore/tdehw/tdecryptographiccarddevice.cpp @@ -171,10 +171,17 @@ void CryptoCardDeviceWatcher::run() { SCardDisconnect(hCard, SCARD_LEAVE_CARD); } - if (!readers[i].contains(cardDevice->friendlyName())) { - if (!cardDevice->friendlyName().contains(reader_vendor_name) || - ((reader_interface_type != "") && !cardDevice->friendlyName().contains(reader_vendor_name))) { - continue; + /* FIXME + * If only one reader was detected by PCSC, assume it corresponds to the current device node. + * This is fragile, but avoids corner cases with common systems failing to work due to + * mismatched udev / PCSC card reader vendor names... + */ + if (readers.count() > 1) { + if (!readers[i].contains(cardDevice->friendlyName())) { + if (!cardDevice->friendlyName().contains(reader_vendor_name) || + ((reader_interface_type != "") && !cardDevice->friendlyName().contains(reader_vendor_name))) { + continue; + } } } -- cgit v1.2.3