1 files changed, 0 insertions, 167 deletions
diff --git a/kspell2/tests/backgroundtest.cpp b/kspell2/tests/backgroundtest.cpp
deleted file mode 100644
index a732799e5..000000000
--- a/kspell2/tests/backgroundtest.cpp
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,167 +0,0 @@
-/**
- * backgroundtest.cpp
- *
- * Copyright (C)  2004  Zack Rusin <zack@kde.org>
- *
- * This library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
- * modify it under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public
- * License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either
- * version 2.1 of the License, or (at your option) any later version.
- *
- * This library is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
- * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
- * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the GNU
- * Lesser General Public License for more details.
- *
- * You should have received a copy of the GNU Lesser General Public
- * License along with this library; if not, write to the Free Software
- * Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA
- * 02110-1301  USA
- */
-#include "backgroundtest.h"
-#include "backgroundtest.moc"
-
-#include "broker.h"
-using namespace KSpell2;
-
-#include <kapplication.h>
-#include <kdebug.h>
-
-const char *text = "Rationale \
-========= \
- \
-This code is intended to provide an implementation of the W3C's XPath \
-specification for KHTML. XPath isn't particularly useful on its own, however\
-it is an essential building block for the implementation of other standards \
-like XSLT and XQuery. XPath is supported to a greater or lesser extent by both\
-IE and Mozilla so it is likely to become increasingly important over the next\
-few years.\
- \
-Why write another XPath implementation? \
-======================================= \
- \
-The are already a number of XPath implementations available under free \
-licenses including Mozilla's, libxml2, Xerces and probably others, so it is \
-reasonable to ask why there should be another one. \
- \
-It would certainly be possible to integrate one of these implementations into\
-KHTML, but it would actually be quite a lot of work. I looked at all of the\
-implementations mentioned with a view to using this approach before I decided\
-to start from scratch.\
- \
-Mozilla XPath\
--------------\
- \
-Seems to be incomplete, and though the code was originally standalone it now\
-seems to be tied to the mozilla codebase quite tightly. This makes porting it\
-a lot of work, and makes working with the mozilla team on fixing bugs\
-etc. hard as the code bases would have diverged quite a lot.\
- \
-Xerces XPath (C++ version)\
---------------------------\
- \
-The Xerces code seemed pretty clean and was reasonably understandable, however\
-it doesn't seem to be used very much which greatly reduces the utility. As\
-with the mozilla code, porting it to use KHTML's DOM would take a fair bit of \
-work. The main issue here being that Xerces is based around pointers to Nodes\
-rather than implicitly shared Node objects.\
- \
-libxml2 \
-------- \
- \
-This is the most obvious library to reuse as it is currently used to generate\
-the KDE documentation, and is also a very complete and fast\
-implementation. The down side of using this code is that it would either need\
-a new DOM implementation in KHTML (which used the libxml2 structures), a \
-wrapper library that made on of the DOM trees support the API of the other, or\
-binding layer that parsed the XML twice and somehow maintained a mapping\
-between the two DOM trees. Unfortunately the documentation of this library is\
-less than great, which would add to the problems.\
- \
-The C++ wrappers to libxml2 are considerably closer to what I was looking\
-for. They are well documented and have a well structured API. Unfortunately\
-using this library still requires some mechanism to integrate the two\
-underlying DOM implementations.\
- \
-KHTML XPath\
------------ \
- \
-There are some advantages to the XPath implementation Zack and I are working\
-on, namely: \
- \
-- Ease of integration with the rest of kjs/khtml.\
-- Use of dom2 traversal (which will also be available to use directly).\
-- C++ rather than C and a wrapper (reducing the overheads).\
-- The code is clean and uses familiar types and idioms. \
- \
-We intend the code to be build on top of the DOM api rather than tying it\
-directly to the Qt or KHTML XML implementations. This will allow us to take\
-advantage of any improvements that might be made to the underlying parser\
-etc. The DOM2 traversal APIs provide a set of classes that map almost directly \
-to the XPath location steps, since we need to implement these facilities\
-anyway writing the relatively small amount of code needed to support XPath\
-seems sensible.\
- \
-Building \
-========\
- \
-This code needs to live in a subdir off the khtml directory in tdelibs. The\
-subdir should be called 'xpath'. The easiest way to regenerate the makefiles\
-is to go to the root of the tdelibs tree and run: \
-  create_makefiles khtml/xpath\
- \
-This code is intended to compile, but not to work.\
- \
-Usage \
-===== \
- \
-./test_xpath simple.xml\
-./test_values\
-./test_functions \
- \
-Notes\
-===== \
- \
-apidoc                  Duh! It's the docs \
-working                 Stuff that i'm mining for ideas\
-\
-Discussion\
-========== \
- \
-If you want to talk about this code feel free to mail us.";
-
-BackgroundTest::BackgroundTest()
-    : TQObject( 0 )
-{
-    m_checker = new BackgroundChecker( Broker::openBroker(), this );
-    connect( m_checker, TQT_SIGNAL(done()),
-             TQT_SLOT(slotDone()) );
-    connect( m_checker, TQT_SIGNAL(misspelling(const TQString&, int)),
-             TQT_SLOT(slotMisspelling(const TQString&, int)) );
-    m_len = strlen( text );
-    m_checker->checkText( text );
-    m_timer.start();
-}
-
-void BackgroundTest::slotDone()
-{
-    kdDebug()<<"Text of length "<<m_len<<" checked in "
-             << m_timer.elapsed() << " msec."<<endl;
-    TQApplication::exit();
-}
-
-void BackgroundTest::slotMisspelling( const TQString& word, int start )
-{
-    kdDebug()<<"Misspelling \""<< word << "\" at " << start << endl;
-    m_checker->continueChecking();
-}
-
-
-int main( int argc, char** argv )
-{
-    TDEApplication app(argc, argv, "KSpell2Test");
-
-    BackgroundTest test;
-
-    return app.exec();
-}